Not all published research is created equal. The peer review process doesn’t guarantee quality, so how do you separate robust evidence from unreliable studies? Start with the basics: • Is the research question clear and relevant? • Do the participants represent your patients? • Are the methods appropriate to answer the question? • Can you judge how important the findings are for practice? Remember: a well-conducted observational study is more valuable than a poorly executed systematic review. Th

Library Guides: Systematic Reviews: Introduction

Are Systematic Reviews Qualitative or Quantitative - DistillerSR

Systematic Random Sampling | Definition, Formula & Examples

Systematic Deception | Documentary

Foundations An Overview of Systematic Theology - Movie