Major Questions is a recurring series by Adam White, which analyzes the court’s approach to administrative law, agencies, and the lower courts. Does legislative history have a future in judicial […] ...

Discover how judges' interpretations shape laws. Dive into bias, impartiality, and the invisible influence of their personalities on legal outcomes.

The Wisconsin Supreme Court is scheduled to hear oral arguments Wednesday in a case that highlights how judges can apply different interpretations of the law and constitution to suit their ideological ...

Katie Eyer discusses how courts’ statutory interpretation shapes civil rights enforcement. In a conversation with The ...

After repeated but cryptic rebukes from the justices, Judge Brian Murphy last week again ruled against one of the ...

Supreme Court handed down an opinion by Chief Justice John Roberts declaring unlawful President Donald Trump’s imposition of sweeping tariffs through the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.

Forbes contributors publish independent expert analyses and insights. Admitted NY Bar and US Tax Court, covers US international tax law. A recent federal court ruling may let some taxpayers seek ...

Sign up for Executive Dysfunction, a weekly newsletter that surfaces under-the-radar stories about what Trump is doing to the law—and how the law is pushing back ...

The court displayed its independence in what was a stinging rebuke to President Trump, though the ruling is unlikely to have an immediate effect on prices. By The New York Times The Supreme Court’s ...

Chief Justice John Roberts brought the drama Friday as he ascended the courtroom bench to declare — at long last — President Donald Trump’s tariffs unlawful. For 10 gripping minutes, he methodically ...

Washington — The Supreme Court on Friday ruled President Trump does not have the authority to unilaterally impose sweeping tariffs on nearly every country under a federal emergency powers law, ...