News
What a Ruling to Fix Google’s Search Monopoly Means for the Company
Under Judge Mehta’s ruling, Google is required to hand over some search results to rival companies. Sharing its data, which has been the backbone of its search engine, could help Microsoft, OpenAI, Perplexity and others improve their search products.
Federal prosecutors pushed a judge to force Google to sell its Chrome browser after the company was ruled as a monopolist in ...
Judge Amit P. Mehta rejected the Justice Department’s call to break up Google, listing remedies for his finding last year that it has an illegal monopoly in search.
Mountain View search and digital-advertising giant must stop cutting deals with other companies to make its search engine and ...
Google was spared the worst possible judgement in its antitrust case, and this came as a relief not just for Google but also ...
Google doesn't have to sell its wildly popular Chrome web browser, but it can't engage in exclusive search deals, US District ...
U.S. District Court Judge Amit P. Mehta outlined remedies on Tuesday that would bar Google from entering or maintaining exclusive deals that tie the distribution of Search, Chrome, Google Assistant, ...
A federal jury has ordered Google to pay $425.7 million for improperly snooping on people's smartphones during a nearly ...
The search monopoly looks weaker, not stronger, after this week's antitrust remedies. Here's why.
Google is bringing improved translation to Circle to Search, its feature that allows users to quickly search for any ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback