Kerala High Court held that summons issued under section 70 of the CGST/ SGST Act cannot be deemed to be initiation of proceedings for the purpose of Section 6 (2) (b) of the CGST/ SGST Act.

Kerala High Court reduced the penal liability under section 67 of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act instead of penalty equal to twice the tax allegedly sought to be evaded by the petitioner taking note ...

This Writ Petition has been filed, challenging the detention order under Section 129 (3) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, dated 23.08.2024, on the premise that the goods were meant for ...

SEO Title: Madras High Court Ruling in Krith Enterprises Case ...

GPT Infraprojects: GPT Infra operates in infrastructure development, particularly in civil construction, with a focus on railways, bridges, and roads. The company has a TTM revenue of ₹1,024 crore and ...

The petitioner, essentially, impugns the Show Cause Notice dated 24.07.2024 (hereafter the impugned SCN) whereby the ...

Reckon Industries Limited, the Delhi High Court addressed a petition filed by the defendant, who was contesting a commercial ...

After reviewing the arguments, the CESTAT determined that the proceedings were flawed, particularly regarding the denial of ...

In the case of SEIL Energy India Limited Vs Union of India, the Andhra Pradesh High Court addressed the issue of whether a ...

5. Learned Authorised Representative (AR) for the Revenue reiterated the finding in the impugned order and submits that in ...

In the case of PCIT vs. Peerless General Finance and Investment Co. Ltd., the Calcutta High Court dismissed an appeal filed ...

In Bansal Exim Vs Commissioner of DGST, the Delhi High Court addressed the cancellation of Bansal Exim’s GST registration, ...