The Fifth Circuit will hear seven cases at its en banc session this week—the most the full federal appeals court has taken up at one sitting in at least 25 years.

A federal court of appeals performed some rare theatrics and reversed a Trump administration victory in a Wednesday ruling over the long-beleaguered Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). In a two-page per curiam order, the full U.S. Court of Appeals ...

The carriers’ cases against the FCC rely on the Supreme Court’s June 2024 ruling in Securities and Exchange Commission v. Jarkesy, which held that a similar but not identical SEC system for issuing fines violated the right to a jury trial.

The Supreme Court on Tuesday considered a challenge to a federal law limiting the amount of money that political parties can spend in coordination with a candidate for office. During over two hours of oral argument in National Republican Senatorial ...

WASHINGTON − The Supreme Court could eliminate one of the remaining checks on money in politics in a case that worries advocates fighting the influence of deep-pocketed donors. In a challenge involving Vice President JD Vance, the court will consider on ...

The court’s conservative majority seemed ready to overturn or strictly limit a landmark decision from 1935 in a case dealing with President Trump’s attempt to fire a member of the Federal Trade Commission. Ann E. Marimow Reporting from Washington The ...

It’s the age-old question: Does the Supreme Court decide its cases based on rank partisanship rather than legal principles? Of course, this raises the obvious follow-up: Which cases are the important ones? In answering this, many look no further than the ...

The Supreme Court heard oral arguments Dec. 8 in Trump v. Slaughter, a rather innocuous case that has the potential to reshape the landscape of our government’s separation of powers. While this case is important, so too is the manner in which the news ...

Exterior of the US Supreme Court building with columns and two statues of two seated persons. The US Supreme Court is weighing the president’s authority to impose tariffs, which could have implications for regulating both climate change and other issues.